Resistance: "I have nothing to talk about today"

cactusThere comes a time, fairly early in many psychotherapies, when there is nothing left to talk about.  The identified problems have been named and discussed, there is no more need to bring the therapist up to speed on one’s history.  In essence, the patient’s conscious agenda for coming to therapy has been exhausted.  I tell trainees this often happens around session #7 — truly it’s more variable than that — when the patient has voiced all his or her prepared topics, said everything already known or consciously felt about the issues, and offered all the background he or she believes is relevant.  The patient may then appeal to the therapist for guidance, not in any profound sense, but simply to suggest something to talk about, so they don’t sit there in awkward silence.

A dynamic therapist typically turns this back on the hapless patient:  “Say anything that comes to mind.”  This challenge can bring therapy to a grinding halt — or trigger the start of genuine exploration.  For it is only when the patient speaks unrehearsed and without self-censorship, in the moment, that the two can observe the here-and-now workings of the patient’s mind.  It has been mere preamble up to this point, groundwork at best and chit-chat at worst, not the real work of dynamic psychotherapy.  Speaking “without a script” allows topics to arise that are impolite, uncomfortable, and awkward, ideas the patient previously thought but chose not to say, feelings that had been brushed aside up to that point.  Some patients unfortunately cannot speak without a script; it is too scary and they are too defensive.  Dynamic therapy ends at that point, although emotional support and cognitive techniques may still prove very helpful.  But for those with the courage to look at themselves, their own defenses, resistance, and unconscious motivation, it’s time to dive in and explore the unknown.

In a similar vein, patients at any stage of treatment sometimes arrive to a session with nothing to discuss that day.  They exude an uncharacteristic blandness or boredom, as if to signal: “Nothing to see here, just move along.”  With a mildly apologetic tone they claim to have no burning issues, nothing especially vexing or troubling.  In fact, maybe it’s time to talk about wrapping up treatment…

If this presentation stands in contrast to the patient’s usual enthusiasm, I take it as a very good sign.  Something emotionally important is going on, and the patient’s Unconscious is trying desperately to throw us off the trail.  In the language of dynamic therapy, this is resistance: unconscious effort to avoid painful or troubling material in therapy.  Some patients employ this sort of resistance constantly, and for this reason are either very challenging to treat, or they “vote with their feet” and leave treatment early in the process.  But when a new resistance stands in clear contrast to the patient’s typical openness, it is easier for the therapist to recognize it, easier to point it out to the patient (who is more open to hearing about it), and easier to identify dynamics that may underlie it.

In my experience, these unusually boring or bland openings lead, more often than not, to the best sessions.  Because the patient is not consciously avoiding a troubling issue, and because I rarely know at first what motivates the patient’s avoidance that day, it becomes a shared exploration where new discoveries and insights come to light.  For reasons I can’t quite explain, the factors motivating such resistance are not deeply buried or inaccessible.  They usually become apparent to both of us well within the 50-minute hour.  “Making the unconscious conscious” (in Freud’s famous words) leads the patient to new and unexpected insights — usually a delightful experience for us both — and also to clearing of the leaden resistance, which is no longer needed to keep the material out of consciousness.  Rather than heralding the end of the treatment, awkward silence at the start of an hour, like the awkwardness near the start of many a dynamic psychotherapy, points the way to important thoughts and feelings.  It turns out there is a lot to talk about.

4 comments to Resistance: “I have nothing to talk about today”

  • Jesse

    So true. What is valuable is curious exploration of anything that has occurred. Nothing is too trivial. The psychiatrist needs to keep the fullest picture in mind and see nothing as irrelevant. A simple example: a perfectionistic patient who had been coming weekly for anxiety/depression (that generic basket) had forgotten the check she brought to each session (which she never had been asked to do). Realizing it, she offered to go back right away (a 45 minute drive!) and then changed that to later that same day. Exploring what led her to feel such necessity produced the most valuable material, but perhaps most valuable of all was the increase in her observing ego. That is, she started to become more curious about her own thoughts and feelings, regarding them as invaluable clues rather than obstacles.

    • I agree completely. Minor lapses — arriving late, forgetting to bring payment — have proven very useful in helping patients become conscious of “impolite” or ego-alien feelings. The very feelings, that is, they would rather not notice. Curiosity seems to be the linchpin. Incurious mental health professionals don’t provide much benefit, incurious patients don’t get better. When and how do people lose their curiosity, especially about something so central and personal? Thanks for writing.

  • Elizabeth

    I am guilty of pre-scripting topics for discussion with my therapist and also of stating I’ve nothing to discuss when, in reality, there is oh so much that I simply do not know where to begin. Stepping back, however, the information which could possibly be shared is really never very remarkable – just feels that way to me at times. As a result of my perfectionist tendencies, I would like to be able to let go of some of my interpretations (in both personal and professional settings). There is an issue at present involving my therapist to which I am nearly certain she would portray as lacking significant credibility (at least as related to my interpretation) and yet I would rather not discuss it with her – perhaps because I hold her to a different (higher) standard within our prescribed time together? I can think of similar situations in my personal life and even work whereby I internalize the almost absent-minded reactions of others as direct affronts to me. How does one overcome such ideas, especially when part of me really knows that no disregard is intended my way? Or, is my request akin to becoming incurious and, thus, a step further away from my desired ending point (of awareness).

    • Feel free to begin anywhere. Beginning at all is far more important than beginning the right way. There is no right way.

      Information you share is really very remarkable — if it feels that way to you.

      It’s perfectly sensible to be reluctant to raise an issue that your therapist will portray as lacking credibility. No one wants to lack credibility in the eyes of another. Perhaps you are overly sensitive to this possibility. Perhaps you are not, but judge your normal sensitivity in an unusually harsh light. Either way, one does not overcome such ideas through avoidance, but through awareness. Perhaps you could raise this “meta” issue with your therapist: that you choose not to mention certain issues due to your expectation of her reaction. Exploring it together may lead to increased self-awareness regarding your feelings in the presence of your therapist, and may also have the practical effect of allowing you to raise the specific issue you had in mind. Thank you for writing.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>




This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.