{"id":1434,"date":"2019-06-22T11:26:58","date_gmt":"2019-06-22T18:26:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/?p=1434"},"modified":"2019-06-22T11:27:00","modified_gmt":"2019-06-22T18:27:00","slug":"evidence-based-psychotherapy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/?p=1434","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;Evidence based&#8221; psychotherapy"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"225\" height=\"275\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/psychotherapy.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-1435\" srcset=\"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/psychotherapy.jpg 225w, http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/06\/psychotherapy-123x150.jpg 123w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>When a mental health clinic, online referral service, or private practice offers \u201cevidence based\u201d psychotherapy, that certainly sounds like a selling point.&nbsp; It suggests solid science supports the therapy offered \u2014 and that competing services lack this support.&nbsp; But what does this phrase really mean?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cEvidence based medicine\u201d first appeared in the medical literature in 1991.&nbsp; It cast doubt on physicians\u2019 clinical intuition and anecdotal experience, reminding them that science should guide medical practice.&nbsp; (The term was new, the warning was not.)&nbsp; Acceptable scientific evidence included clinical epidemiology, bench research, published case reports, and so on.&nbsp; However, the randomized controlled trial (RCT) soon emerged as the gold standard, the best evidence that a treatment works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In a RCT, subjects who all suffer the same disease are randomly assigned either to the treatment under study, or to a control group.&nbsp; The latter receives an inactive placebo, or sometimes an active comparison treatment.&nbsp; Ideally, RCTs are \u201cdouble blind\u201d: neither the subjects nor those rating them know who is in which group.&nbsp; This minimizes psychological effects such as confirmation bias, where both researchers and subjects tend to rate more improvement where they expect to see it.&nbsp; If the treatment group then fares better on average, this is taken as strong evidence of treatment efficacy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>RCTs are powerful tools \u2014 with limitations.&nbsp; Best for studying a single treatment applied to a single disease, the method becomes impractical when studying patients with multiple or ill-defined conditions, or when assessing treatments with nuanced variations.&nbsp; It can be hard to find a suitable placebo or comparison treatment, and sometimes it proves impossible to create double-blind conditions.&nbsp; For a variety of reasons, there is still an important role for evidence aside from RCTs.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the field of psychotherapy, the paradigm in the first half of the 20<sup>th<\/sup> century was psychoanalysis and its offshoots.&nbsp; Its prominence was largely due to intellectual elegance and compelling case reports, not RCTs.&nbsp; But by mid-century, critics began questioning the broad claims of psychoanalysis.&nbsp; New medications and psychotherapies were introduced.&nbsp; And in 1980, psychiatry\u2019s <em>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual<\/em> was revised.&nbsp; It would thereafter define mental disorders not narratively, but by symptom criteria.&nbsp; With the right set of symptoms, a patient would \u201cmeet criteria\u201d for one or more diagnoses.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Drug developers and the newer schools of therapy, especially cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and short-term structured therapies, were eager to prove they could reduce these symptoms and, by definition, relieve psychiatric disorders.&nbsp; Many RCTs were done, and indeed these studies showed, on average, that symptoms were reduced.&nbsp; This led to FDA approval for the medications, and to \u201cevidence based\u201d claims for the therapies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Yes, CBT and other symptom-focused therapy is \u201cevidence based.\u201d\u00a0 But that\u2019s only part of the story.\u00a0 Left unsaid is that a great deal of scientific <a href=\"https:\/\/jonathanshedler.com\/PDFs\/Shedler%20(2010)%20Efficacy%20of%20Psychodynamic%20Psychotherapy.pdf\">evidence<\/a> finds traditional, psychoanalytically based therapy effective as well.\u00a0 This includes group studies using standardized measures \u2014 even RCTs \u2014 as well as patient satisfaction <a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/8561380\">surveys<\/a>, a myriad of case reports, and other lines of evidence.\u00a0 Although there are fewer RCTs of analytic therapy than CBT, often the amount of improvement (the statistical \u201ceffect size\u201d) is greater in the former.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cEvidence based\u201d also glosses over why people seek therapy.&nbsp; Many hope to decrease concrete symptoms: to feel less anxious, to have a brighter mood, to sleep more soundly.&nbsp; Here the evidence supporting CBT and similar treatments is very solid.&nbsp; But others are motivated by vague complaints that arise only in the context of close relationships.&nbsp; Or by a lack of meaning in life. &nbsp; Or by unwitting self-sabotage.&nbsp; Not uncommonly, they really can\u2019t say what is wrong.&nbsp; No RCTs exist for such problems, as there is no diagnostic group to randomize, no concrete symptoms to treat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It reflects a fundamental misunderstanding \u2014 or false advertising \u2014 to promote \u201cevidence based psychotherapy\u201d for these sufferers.&nbsp; There is no such evidence, if by that we mean RCTs.&nbsp; Yet if evidence is more broadly construed, as it was in the original conception of \u201cevidence based medicine,\u201d it is psychoanalytic therapy, not CBT, that is supported by far more evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u201cEvidence based therapy\u201d has quickly become an empty phrase that slights the competition.&nbsp; The evidence is real, but its relevance often is not.&nbsp; This false narrative has misled insurers, government agencies, and many patients into believing certain approaches to psychotherapy are inherently superior when they are not.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Cognitive, highly structured, symptom-focused therapies certainly help many people.\u00a0 Psychoanalytic therapies, and other therapies that rely on depth and relatedness, do as well.\u00a0 The best choice for an individual depends on factors unique to that person, starting with his or her presenting complaints and preferences.\u00a0 It may or may not be relevant that a particular therapeutic approach works against specific symptoms as tested in RCTs.\u00a0 \u201cEvidence based\u201d is mostly sales-talk, not a blanket scientific endorsement.\u00a0 All mainstream psychotherapy is evidence-based.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Image by\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/users\/geralt-9301\/?utm_source=link-attribution&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=image&amp;utm_content=466987\"><em>Gerd Altmann<\/em><\/a><em>\u00a0from\u00a0<\/em><a href=\"https:\/\/pixabay.com\/?utm_source=link-attribution&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_campaign=image&amp;utm_content=466987\"><em>Pixabay<\/em><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"\n<p>When a mental health clinic, online referral service, or private practice offers \u201cevidence based\u201d psychotherapy, that certainly sounds like a selling point.&nbsp; It suggests solid science supports the therapy offered \u2014 and that competing services lack this support.&nbsp; But what does this phrase really mean?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cEvidence based medicine\u201d first appeared in the medical literature [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8],"tags":[45,53],"class_list":["post-1434","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-psychotherapy","tag-psychiatric-research","tag-psychodynamics","odd"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1434","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1434"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1434\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1437,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1434\/revisions\/1437"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1434"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1434"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1434"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}