{"id":1156,"date":"2016-05-30T12:14:27","date_gmt":"2016-05-30T19:14:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/?p=1156"},"modified":"2016-05-31T13:35:29","modified_gmt":"2016-05-31T20:35:29","slug":"dilemmas-of-cash-based-practice","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/?p=1156","title":{"rendered":"Dilemmas of cash-based practice"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/?attachment_id=1161\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-1161\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-1161\" src=\"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/cash.jpg\" alt=\"cash\" width=\"225\" height=\"275\" srcset=\"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/cash.jpg 225w, http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/05\/cash-123x150.jpg 123w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/a>I write in response to a recent post on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.kevinmd.com\/blog\/2016\/05\/thinking-starting-cash-based-practice-pros-cons.html\">KevinMD<\/a>\u00a0and the comments that followed. A primary care\u00a0physician named Ashley Maltz discussed advantages and disadvantages of a cash-based practice. I appreciate\u00a0her\u00a0evenhanded tone:\u00a0she prefers\u00a0this model yet\u00a0expressed\u00a0concern for patients who can&#8217;t use\u00a0it. In the comments section, several physicians extolled the virtues of cash-pay, but patients were mixed. It&#8217;s attractive for those who can afford it, while\u00a0it worries, and maybe angers,\u00a0those who can&#8217;t.<\/p>\n<p>I enjoy the personal and patient benefits of a mostly cash-pay psychiatric practice\u00a0(I also see some patients under Medicare). I like running my own small business, keeping clinically useful paper charts as opposed to a ponderous EHR, and protecting my patients&#8217; privacy. \u00a0Billing is simple enough that I do it myself. There is also an argument for keeping the relationship dyadic, i.e., 2-person, in psychotherapy. Third party payers can complicate the therapeutic\u00a0relationship in a domain where clarity is paramount. \u00a0Most of my private\u00a0practice colleagues\u00a0likewise avoid insurance panels. \u00a0It&#8217;s become the norm in my field.<\/p>\n<p>Yet we&#8217;re all painfully aware that most of the seriously mentally ill can&#8217;t come to our offices. \u00a0They are relegated to county\u00a0clinics, training settings, and to the rare private practitioner\u00a0who still accepts public insurance. \u00a0Like Dr. Maltz, I&#8217;m saddened that<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>those on Medicaid or disability programs cannot be seen for cash by medical providers for medical care. Most of these people do not have the financial means to seek alternative types of care. Thus, they are seen in large community clinics with overworked providers and limited resources.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Some critics of cash-based psychiatric practice\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/ww2.kqed.org\/stateofhealth\/2016\/05\/24\/how-therapy-became-a-hobby-of-the-wealthy-rather-than-a-necessity-for-the-mentally-ill\/\">exaggerate<\/a>, painting a picture of high-society shrinks getting rich off the worried well. \u00a0They point\u00a0to real or\u00a0imagined\u00a0$400\/hr\u00a0psychiatrists\u00a0calming the\u00a0Silicon Valley nouveau riche. Others like Allen Frances M.D. provide a more balanced <a href=\"http:\/\/www.huffingtonpost.com\/allen-frances\/the-hall-of-shame-who-is-_b_5730302.html\">critique<\/a>, noting that individual psychiatrists gravitate toward more functional patients, but that we are only a small part of a very large puzzle. \u00a0It appears\u00a0that as a society we prefer\u00a0not to pay\u00a0for treatment of the seriously disturbed, but only for the\u00a0jails and prisons they occupy\u00a0after\u00a0committing\u00a0minor property and lifestyle crimes due to their condition.<\/p>\n<p>Our\u00a0situation in psychiatry is a harbinger for primary care. \u00a0There&#8217;s no denying the advantages of cash-based practice; it serves both doctors and patients very well. \u00a0Yet\u00a0cash-based primary care\u00a0practices, like psychiatric practices, exclude many patients who can&#8217;t afford them. They\u00a0can&#8217;t\u00a0comprehensively serve the primary care or psychiatric needs of a population. \u00a0Even more obviously, almost no one\u00a0can pay out of pocket for more\u00a0elaborate medical care, such as major surgery or a lengthy ICU stay.<\/p>\n<p>There&#8217;s a basic tension between health care as a private transaction and health care as a public good. Regarding the former, we can show our compassion by offering some free or low-fee care, or by treating some publicly insured patients under Medicare or Medicaid. This way we avoid elitism and do our part for the less fortunate. However, we must recognize that no matter how charitable we are as individual physicians, many more are in need of our services than our charity can accommodate. The private transaction model of medical care cannot save sick people from dying in the street. Universal access to health services is needed.<\/p>\n<p>While taxpayer-funded Medicare and Medicaid cover many patients who cannot otherwise afford care, our current backstop is <a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Emergency_Medical_Treatment_and_Active_Labor_Act\">EMTALA<\/a>, the 1986 federal law requiring hospital Emergency Departments to evaluate and treat emergencies regardless of ability to pay. According to the Centers for Medicare &amp; Medicaid Services, 55% of U.S. emergency care now goes uncompensated, costing hospital systems tens of billions annually. Much of this cost\u00a0is shifted to paying patients, inflating medical bills for everyone else. One way or another, society (i.e., we) pay to keep our fellow Americans alive and relatively well. It would be far more economical, not to mention humane, to offer universal access earlier, before health problems progress to emergencies \u2014 just as it would be to treat the seriously mentally ill before they need to be imprisoned.<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s no surprise that many patients who are otherwise sympathetic to the plight of demoralized, burned-out doctors draw the line at a cash-based care model that excludes them. In order to ally with these patients, those of us with cash-based practices should at minimum acknowledge the need for a two-tier model, public and private. Better yet, we need to think hard about who provides services in the universal-access public tier. Should this be all of us at some point in our careers, i.e., a type of &#8220;doctor draft&#8221; or public service requirement? Should these services be ceded to PAs and NPs? Or can\u00a0we &#8220;let the market decide&#8221;, such that these\u00a0services are provided by physicians who aren&#8217;t sharp, ambitious, or economically secure enough to hang a shingle\u00a0\u2014\u00a0or for whatever reason prefer not to? \u00a0These hard questions must be\u00a0answered if we&#8217;re to be intellectually honest\u00a0and admit that the physician&#8217;s role in society is more than entrepreneur.<\/p>\n<p><em>Image courtesy of sheelamohan\u00a0at FreeDigitalPhotos.net<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I write in response to a recent post on KevinMD and the comments that followed. A primary care physician named Ashley Maltz discussed advantages and disadvantages of a cash-based practice. I appreciate her evenhanded tone: she prefers this model yet expressed concern for patients who can&#8217;t use it. In the comments section, several physicians extolled [&#8230;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[67],"tags":[74,73],"class_list":["post-1156","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-medical-practice","tag-kevinmd","tag-medical-practice","odd"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1156"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1165,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1156\/revisions\/1165"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1156"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1156"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/blog.stevenreidbordmd.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1156"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}